Were the pictures you posted in response to this observation in the article? If so, please explain and articulate what relevance they have to supporting or denying the fact that LRon Paul is the crazy uncle in the GOP.
Were the pictures you posted in response to this observation in the article? If so, please explain and articulate what relevance they have to supporting or denying the fact that LRon Paul is the crazy uncle in the GOP.
Just pointing out that attacks on Ron Paul come from the Bush/RINO wing, and not the Reagan/Conservative wing of the party.
This article seems to think that ROMNEY is preferable to Paul.
All Romney did was be a terrible Liberal Governor of Mass, then lie about his Liberal Record.
I’m using the pictures to illustrate on which side of the 1980 Bush vs Reagan conflict that Ron Paul was on. Ron Paul stands with the Conservatives - Reagan, Barry Goldwater, Robert Taft.
Romney stands with Bush (instead of Reagan), Rockefeller (instead of Goldwater), Dewey (instead of Taft).
The Conservatives - Taft, Goldwater, Reagan, Paul, resist more Federal Government intrusion into our lives. The RINOs, the Country Clubbers, the Eastern Establishment, are the enemies of the Conservatives, and always capitulate to Liberal demands for more Federal control over all elements of our lives.
It’s not kooky to be Conservative. Any article that posits that Romney is in any way superior to Paul is a RINO article.
I’m not arguing that Paul is the only acceptable candidate. Palin is a star. Bachmann is also good tea party, and she did great yesterday. But Romney is unacceptable RINO.