Editing error my Aunt Fannie!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Their explanation fits with how I read the non-quote it this morning. It was a case of foolish writing, an attempt to be clever and terrible editing. The “quote” didn’t sound like Palin’s voice so I never took the quote as literal fact.
38 posted on
06/10/2011 10:54:01 PM PDT by
newzjunkey
(Don't screw up the 2012 nomination.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
This is an example of the gutter journalism Politico has become known for. They belong in the grocery store check-out lines alongside the Globe and Examiner and so on. Oh wait, even those rags have SOME standards, don't they?!
43 posted on
06/11/2011 1:33:08 AM PDT by
Ron H.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The authors of the piece, Paul Goldman and Mark J. Rozell, had crafted a paragraph to try to get at what Palin might be thinking. In their original version, they used quotation marks around what they imagined to be Palins thought a common convention in column writing.
Since when is the proper use of Quotation Marks attributable to a person, defined by a writer?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson