While you may not agree with ARTL's take on the data, you can't honestly say it is "unsubstantiated." They have a list of sources longer than your arm at the bottom of the article, all linked.
No thank you. It is not a credible source and anything they print is suspect because of an agenda.
Also, iirc from other threads on here EV, you have your own agenda even if it means sullying someone else to achieve your goal (which keyes will NEVER be elected) you will be happy to perpetuate lies.
Did you read post #40?