Do you believe your wrangling trumps the saving of lives? The simple overturning of Roe would do that. As you know the SCOTUS can reverse prior decisions. That is within their Constitutional powers is it not?
What you don’t understand, obviously, is that Palin’s position gives away the only principles that could ever “overturn” Roe.
Roe turned on whether or not the fetus is a person. Blackmun and Co. dehumanized the child, while admitting that if this was a person, they would obviously be protected by the explicit imperative requirement of the Constitution.
Modern “pro-life” “Republicans” like Palin do something more egregious: they admit the fetus is a person, but say that under certain specified circumstances they can be killed. You know, if a state thinks baby butchery is okay. Or if their father was a criminal.