Socialism's Army of Occupation

Keeping the staff on the clock to assist people who can’t or won’t follow the rules is exactly what is wrong with the welfare state and its Army of Occupation. Your entitlement mentality is disturbing.

Working overtime in a private sector service industry is a must if you care to keep your customers. If I told one of my clients that their entitlement mentality was disturbing because they wait until the last minute I would soon find myself without clients.

The difference is that the USPS doesn't care to serve their customers because customer service has nothing to do with their income.

It is a delivery service, most of it's budget will be spend on the people doing the deliveries.

I think you miss the point being made. For a private firm to make a profit and pay their poeple, they must exist to serve their customer even if their goal is to get that profit. The USPS doesn't have to please the customer because their pay isn't determined by customer satifaction.

>>Working overtime in a private sector service industry is a must if you care to keep your customers. If I told one of my clients that their entitlement mentality was disturbing because they wait until the last minute I would soon find myself without clients.

My point was that although the poster knows that the deadline is fixed and the hours of the Post Office are clearly posted, he chooses to push the limits and go beyond. Then, he expects others to adapt to his schedule. If some welfare sow was on here saying that the USPS isn’t meeting her needs because they closed before she could get her welfare paperwork mailed, the response would be “tough sh!t, sister. Learn to show up on time.” Entitlement mentality is entitlement mentality. Why should the cost of my stamps increase because he can’t get his work done on time?

If a client needs me to do something extra because of events beyond their control, I accept that as a business expense. But, if the client is routinely late with needed documents and expects me to eat the extra costs, then we have a problem. If I charge a fixed fee, should I raise the fee for all customers because a minority of clients think they’re too important to respect a deadline?

Disclaimer: I do not work for the Post Office. Never have. Never will. If it wasn’t for Netflix, I wouldn’t even need a mailbox, so I don’t give a crap about them. I’m more concerned with the original article’s statements about nurses being welfare for unions.

I get your point and I agree that the poster should meet the known deadlines. But the larger point is that the USPS doesn't have to respond to customer needs because making that customer happy doesn't matter. In a competitive environment, an alternate mail carrier might offer later hours to attract the business of our poster. Without that competitive environment, USPS and any other government agency has no incentive.

As for raising prices, competitors might have sliding scale pricing for services that are in demand. Look at what FedEx has done with parcel delivery. People are willing to pay more for a service that the USPS didn't offer and now the USPS is trying to recapture that market by offering better service for parcel delivery.

USPS is just one example and perhaps not the best since there is some competition for that service. In other agencies where competition is forbidden or the government artificially lowers pricing by making up the shortfall with tax money, we see more egregious examples of lack of customer service.

For the record, I often tell my clients that there is fast, good and cheap... they can have any TWO, but not all three. That my clients have an entitlement mentality is beside the point. If I serve them better at a cost they are willing to pay, then I make money. If I take a stand on principle, I might lose those clients to someone willing to meet their needs. I, myself, end up in situations, sometimes of my own making, where I demand more from my consultants than I should. That they perform is why I am loyal to them and refuse to shop them based solely on price.

>>For the record, I often tell my clients that there is fast, good and cheap... they can have any TWO, but not all three.

Me too. Usually, they think that I don’t have the right to say that...but I’m sure they tell their customers the same thing. I guess that its just human nature to expect everyone else to work cheap, but value your own labor higher than all other. That’s the entitlement mentality I’m talking about.

Its like the story about the doctor who lives next to an auto mechanic. He expects the mechanic to “help him out” by working on his car for free, but when the mechanic shows up at the doc’s office for a free visit, he gets told that you always have to pay for professional services.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.