Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: This Just In

I’m missing something. How can someone flee if he is free to go? If not free to go, then he is in custody already. I don’t get it.


21 posted on 06/02/2011 11:11:31 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: swain_forkbeard

No, you’re not missing anything. “Free to go” seems pretty cut and dry, and it is, UNLESS you’re dealing with MTA Officers, or airport security. You, as a law abiding citizen, is subject to the emotional state of mind of these officers. So each situation requires a calm analysis of which action to take.

These MTA officers were obviously stepping over the limits of authority, which is why Fussell will win this law suit.

Fussell may have believed that despite the fact that he may have been within his rights to leave, prudence required that he remain. The unreasonable officers may have “felt” that he was trying to flee.

It’s all speculation, but the scenario is plausible. After all, it’s happened in the past.


22 posted on 06/02/2011 11:18:27 AM PDT by This Just In (In America, RINO's belong in zoo's, not public office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson