Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Republicans Will Lose 2012 and I got the ZOT
Conservative for Change ^ | June 2, 2011 | Roger F. Gay

Posted on 06/02/2011 7:25:35 AM PDT by RogerFGay

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

1 posted on 06/02/2011 7:25:36 AM PDT by RogerFGay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay

Nice to see you again, Roger. Nicely written as always, though I don’t agree with all of it. You’re going to get flamed, of course, but you’ve always handled that well.


2 posted on 06/02/2011 7:31:05 AM PDT by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay
At the rate the economy is tanking, an Obama reelect is not a lock.
3 posted on 06/02/2011 7:32:56 AM PDT by JPG (Sarah Palin, driving the MSM crazy one day at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay

Don your asbestos suit, Roger. Some on this site won’t brook any criticism of Saint Ronnie.


4 posted on 06/02/2011 7:36:20 AM PDT by sauropod (The truth shall make you free but first it will make you miserable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay

a gay for Obama. How fitting


5 posted on 06/02/2011 7:36:57 AM PDT by sevinufnine (Sevin - "If we do not fight when we know we can win, we'll have to fight when we know we will lose")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
Nice to see you again, Roger. Nicely written as always, though I don’t agree with all of it. You’re going to get flamed, of course, but you’ve always handled that well.

Thanks and I know. Reagan was the greatest leader the RINO movement will ever know and self-described conservatives are still suffering from the brain-washing.
6 posted on 06/02/2011 7:40:47 AM PDT by RogerFGay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay

Mitt Romney (code-name: Chameleon)

He will be the nominee...


7 posted on 06/02/2011 7:41:47 AM PDT by choctaw man (Good ole Andrew Jackson, or You're the Reason God Made Oklahoma...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
Don your asbestos suit, Roger. Some on this site won’t brook any criticism of Saint Ronnie.

LOL! And yet, for all their love of the man, they didn't recognize that Obama ran on his social policy agenda. How can they love him if they do not know him?
8 posted on 06/02/2011 7:42:30 AM PDT by RogerFGay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: choctaw man
Mitt Romney (code-name: Chameleon) He will be the nominee...

That would surprise me, and I'm at least pretty good at predicting presidential election results. (I've generally not tried to predict primaries, but have a perfect score on general elections - in 2008, I predicted Obama's victory several months in advance - that's what this article is about.)
9 posted on 06/02/2011 7:44:42 AM PDT by RogerFGay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay

The GOP won the women’s vote in 2010.


10 posted on 06/02/2011 7:45:36 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay

I’m hardly brainwashed, but may I point out that when Reagan assumed the presidency, there was a Soviet Union

and when he left, there was no Soviet Union.

That’s all I have to know. I haven’t forgotten the threat.

/And, yes, W will go down as one of the five or six lousiest presidents ever.


11 posted on 06/02/2011 7:45:51 AM PDT by warchild9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay

Oh, and Reagan was uncompromisingly pro-life.

Anti-communist + pro-life = conservative.

In my book.

Not being confrontational, just sayin’...


12 posted on 06/02/2011 7:48:55 AM PDT by warchild9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sevinufnine

Does that mean he is happy?????


13 posted on 06/02/2011 7:50:39 AM PDT by biff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay
A somewhat scatological analysis that has serious omissions. 2012 will be a referendum on Obama and his policies. "Hope and Change" now has a record.

Lots of references made to the 2008 election. No mention of the 2010 "shellacking" of the Dems that was of historic proportions and gained control back of the House from the Dems. It was a watershed event similar to the Dem takeover of Congress in the 2006 midterms, which foreshadowed the huge Dem victory in 2008.

Female voters have turned their backs on President Obama in droves, a development that Democrats vow to reverse as Mr. Obama gears up his re-election campaign.

In 2008, women helped deliver the presidency to Mr. Obama, voting for the Democrat 56 percent to 43 percent over Sen. John McCain, Arizona Republican. Men split their votes between the two candidates almost evenly.

2012 will be one of the most vicious and polarizing elections in our history. Obama will pull the race, ethnic, and gender cards. He will have huge amounts of money. But ultimately, the economy will be the decisive factor.

14 posted on 06/02/2011 7:50:55 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay

The more his dementia set in the more liberal he got.


15 posted on 06/02/2011 7:51:18 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: warchild9

As the definition of “conservative” gets narrower and narrower and has no longer has anything to do with preserving the American way. What good was it to defeat Russian communists and then adopt Russian communism?


16 posted on 06/02/2011 7:51:54 AM PDT by RogerFGay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay

I forget where I heard it, but someone (maybe Bernie Goldberg) commented that people remain supportive of Obama because of superficial reasons like his smile. There are too many people who judge a Presidential election as if it is American Idol. They aren’t judging policies and have minimal depth when they vote.


17 posted on 06/02/2011 7:54:07 AM PDT by ConservativeStatement (Obama "acted stupidly.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay

Subsequent events have nothing to do with Reagan. He is dead.

You were the one who brought him up, and I am specifically addressing that.


18 posted on 06/02/2011 7:54:12 AM PDT by warchild9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay

I am afraid that no matter how you try you will not be able to defeat President Reagan in any election.


19 posted on 06/02/2011 7:54:53 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (Liberty and Union, Now and Forever, One and Inseparable -- Daniel Webster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay

Repost this article in 2013.

Personally, I wouldn’t bet a nickel on Obama.


20 posted on 06/02/2011 7:57:23 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson