Skip to comments.
Why Republicans Will Lose 2012 and I got the ZOT
Conservative for Change ^
| June 2, 2011
| Roger F. Gay
Posted on 06/02/2011 7:25:35 AM PDT by RogerFGay
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-103 next last
1
posted on
06/02/2011 7:25:36 AM PDT
by
RogerFGay
To: RogerFGay
Nice to see you again, Roger. Nicely written as always, though I don’t agree with all of it. You’re going to get flamed, of course, but you’ve always handled that well.
2
posted on
06/02/2011 7:31:05 AM PDT
by
Pan_Yan
To: RogerFGay
At the rate the economy is tanking, an Obama reelect is not a lock.
3
posted on
06/02/2011 7:32:56 AM PDT
by
JPG
(Sarah Palin, driving the MSM crazy one day at a time.)
To: RogerFGay
Don your asbestos suit, Roger. Some on this site won’t brook any criticism of Saint Ronnie.
4
posted on
06/02/2011 7:36:20 AM PDT
by
sauropod
(The truth shall make you free but first it will make you miserable.)
To: RogerFGay
a gay for Obama. How fitting
5
posted on
06/02/2011 7:36:57 AM PDT
by
sevinufnine
(Sevin - "If we do not fight when we know we can win, we'll have to fight when we know we will lose")
To: Pan_Yan
Nice to see you again, Roger. Nicely written as always, though I dont agree with all of it. Youre going to get flamed, of course, but youve always handled that well.
Thanks and I know. Reagan was the greatest leader the RINO movement will ever know and self-described conservatives are still suffering from the brain-washing.
6
posted on
06/02/2011 7:40:47 AM PDT
by
RogerFGay
To: RogerFGay
Mitt Romney (code-name: Chameleon)
He will be the nominee...
7
posted on
06/02/2011 7:41:47 AM PDT
by
choctaw man
(Good ole Andrew Jackson, or You're the Reason God Made Oklahoma...)
To: sauropod
Don your asbestos suit, Roger. Some on this site wont brook any criticism of Saint Ronnie.
LOL! And yet, for all their love of the man, they didn't recognize that Obama ran on his social policy agenda. How can they love him if they do not know him?
8
posted on
06/02/2011 7:42:30 AM PDT
by
RogerFGay
To: choctaw man
Mitt Romney (code-name: Chameleon) He will be the nominee...
That would surprise me, and I'm at least pretty good at predicting presidential election results. (I've generally not tried to predict primaries, but have a perfect score on general elections - in 2008, I predicted Obama's victory several months in advance - that's what this article is about.)
9
posted on
06/02/2011 7:44:42 AM PDT
by
RogerFGay
To: RogerFGay
The GOP won the women’s vote in 2010.
To: RogerFGay
I’m hardly brainwashed, but may I point out that when Reagan assumed the presidency, there was a Soviet Union
and when he left, there was no Soviet Union.
That’s all I have to know. I haven’t forgotten the threat.
/And, yes, W will go down as one of the five or six lousiest presidents ever.
To: RogerFGay
Oh, and Reagan was uncompromisingly pro-life.
Anti-communist + pro-life = conservative.
In my book.
Not being confrontational, just sayin’...
To: sevinufnine
Does that mean he is happy?????
13
posted on
06/02/2011 7:50:39 AM PDT
by
biff
To: RogerFGay
A somewhat scatological analysis that has serious omissions. 2012 will be a referendum on Obama and his policies. "Hope and Change" now has a record.
Lots of references made to the 2008 election. No mention of the 2010 "shellacking" of the Dems that was of historic proportions and gained control back of the House from the Dems. It was a watershed event similar to the Dem takeover of Congress in the 2006 midterms, which foreshadowed the huge Dem victory in 2008.
Female voters have turned their backs on President Obama in droves, a development that Democrats vow to reverse as Mr. Obama gears up his re-election campaign.
In 2008, women helped deliver the presidency to Mr. Obama, voting for the Democrat 56 percent to 43 percent over Sen. John McCain, Arizona Republican. Men split their votes between the two candidates almost evenly.
2012 will be one of the most vicious and polarizing elections in our history. Obama will pull the race, ethnic, and gender cards. He will have huge amounts of money. But ultimately, the economy will be the decisive factor.
14
posted on
06/02/2011 7:50:55 AM PDT
by
kabar
To: RogerFGay
The more his dementia set in the more liberal he got.
15
posted on
06/02/2011 7:51:18 AM PDT
by
DManA
To: warchild9
As the definition of “conservative” gets narrower and narrower and has no longer has anything to do with preserving the American way. What good was it to defeat Russian communists and then adopt Russian communism?
To: RogerFGay
I forget where I heard it, but someone (maybe Bernie Goldberg) commented that people remain supportive of Obama because of superficial reasons like his smile. There are too many people who judge a Presidential election as if it is American Idol. They aren’t judging policies and have minimal depth when they vote.
To: RogerFGay
Subsequent events have nothing to do with Reagan. He is dead.
You were the one who brought him up, and I am specifically addressing that.
To: RogerFGay
I am afraid that no matter how you try you will not be able to defeat President Reagan in any election.
19
posted on
06/02/2011 7:54:53 AM PDT
by
Lucius Cornelius Sulla
(Liberty and Union, Now and Forever, One and Inseparable -- Daniel Webster)
To: RogerFGay
Repost this article in 2013.
Personally, I wouldn’t bet a nickel on Obama.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-103 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson