Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AFTER BIRTH - LFBC Digital Document Analysis
The Hacker Factor Blog ^ | Thursday, April 28. 2011 | Dr. Neal Krawetz

Posted on 05/28/2011 8:54:29 AM PDT by Tex-Con-Man

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181 last
To: Natufian

It doesn’t matter to me what they said because they have already shown they are not credible. I’m giving them the benefit of the doubt by saying their statement isn’t a confirmation that Obama posted what they sent him, based on the fact that they aren’t willing to come right out and say that (which makes no sense if that is really what they were saying) and because what Obama posted does not even meet the legal requirements to be a certified birth certificate.

If I’m wrong and they are really saying that what Obama posted is what they sent, then they need to explain why they didn’t certify the BC according to their rules.

Just a couple of the many reasons not to believe anything they say:

Because they said the same thing about Obama’s COLB, and I have shown that it COULD NOT have been a certified copy.

And because they have documentably lied about official records. I have posted their response to me saying they have no birth record for Virginia Sunahara, as well as the birth index page which shows them as HAVING a birth record for her.

In short, these people are liars so they could well have been claiming that what Obama posted is what they sent. And their statement probably has about an equal likelihood of being true as being not true.

They are also lawless, as I’ve shown on my blog, and a source inside the HDOH has said that a forgery was placed in the HDOH’s records so it could be what they did send; if so, then they are the forgers instead of Obama. And there is probably as high a likelihood that they forged the BC as that Obama’s people forged it.

So they may or may not have said something that may or may not be true, and the BC they gave Obama may or may not have been what Obama posted, and what they sent him may or may not be a forgery, and anything they have that isn’t a forgery may or may not be accurate. And anything they sent him may or may not have followed the rules for legal certification, and regardless of whether they followed the rules or not, they may or may not call it a “certified copy”.

Welcome to the HDOH, where nothing means anything. It all depends on what the meaning of “is” is.

But I think if they were specifically claiming what you think they’re claiming, they wouldn actually come out and confirm that it’s what they are saying.

And if it’s what they sent Obama, then they need to explain why it is not half-handwritten as Fukino said it was.

Basically, what they said makes no difference, because they have lied and contradicted themselves and the law so often that everything that comes from their office is a sick, sick joke.

What difference does it make what either the HDOH or Factcheck have said, when they’ve already been documented as lying on critical issues?


181 posted on 06/27/2011 5:58:57 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson