What I love most about this is if a motion to quash is filed after the information ‘supposedly’ (Obama’s LGBC) has already been released, its a huge red flag.
Why quash something that is already public information if the public information is truthful? If Obama’s LGBC is in fact genuine there should be no problems complying with the subpoena.
However, if the LGBC is fraudulent, there is every reason in the world to file a motion to quash. You would start to see panic like cockroaches caught in the light.
Therefore, if a motion to quash is filed it is highly likely the LGBC is in fact fake and the birthers have been right all along. This will be obvious to everyone except for the most ardent koolaid drinker who will never be convinced.
An objection from fuddy within 14 days on the basis of the HIPAA restrictions on releasing information could only be valid if the Hawaii DOH records are different from the WH disclosed LFBC. How could she make that case in a Federal court without admitting the WH LFBC is a forgery?
Squealing about the non redacted SSN may cause a delay, but if the judge is honest he will begin to suspect the extent of the corruption. A fraudulently used SSN belonging to a dead person is not protected - and a Connecticut prefix is impossible for Obama.