Posted on 05/24/2011 11:44:34 AM PDT by CainMutiny
Hmmm...
Nope, I’m pretty sure my correction of the headline is correct and your update is just angry blather.
How does it work with the FBI and federal crimes?
I guess the best thing is for you to believe what you believe and for me to continue believing what I believe. As I said earlier, it may have something to do with the difference between courts of special jurisdiction and courts of general jurisdiction. And there is a question of statutory law versus common law.
I know when I investigated it in the late 90’s there were still a FEW states where ANY PERSON could convene a grand jury. But in most states, that has been changed and people can’t do it unless they go through the ropes.
I guess it would depend on the Rules of Criminal Procedure for whatever state you are in.
The use of a private prosecutor was incorporated into the common law of Virginia and is still permitted there.[3] Private prosecutors were also used in North Carolina as late as 1975.[8]
From Wiki.
I was right. It’s a common law thing.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_prosecution
El Sordo’s rationale...
Obama promoting his books = good
Corsi promoting his books = bad
The only differences of course is that Corsi authors his own books without the need for a ghost writer (unattributed at that) and Corsi’s books are based on facts, whereas Obama’s are based on fiction.
A better summation of my views:
Jerome Corsi promulgating falsehoods and peddling conspiracy theories for money = Bad
The noob Hotlanta Mike repeating constantly debunked and dis-proven idiocy AND assuming that anyone who doesn't buy into it must be in favor of all that he opposes = Bad
Obama, just because = Bad
Jerome Corsi promulgating falsehoods and peddling conspiracy theories for money = Bad
Really. He can be sued for that can’t he?
It's also not possible at the Federal level.
"Q: How do I file a criminal case?
"Individuals do not file criminal charges in U.S. district courts. A criminal proceeding is initiated by the government, usually through the U.S. attorney's office in coordination with a law enforcement agency. Allegations of criminal behavior should be brought to local police, the FBI, or other appropriate law enforcement agency"
http://www.uscourts.gov/Common/FAQS.aspx
Well, we’ve gone from “Where’d you get that idea? Yur a doofus” (my paraphrase) to “well, you can still do it in Virginia, but that’s the only place” (my paraphrase again).
Even the the article explicitly says it is still possible in Virginia but NEVER says it’s not doable in other jurisdictions as well.
You file the proper papers with the court.
The court either rejects them or lets the time limit pass.
You go to a higher court and petition for a writ of mandamus compelling the lower court to adjudicate the issue.
Look, I understand why the procedures have been adapted. It is to speed up and make uniform the administration of justice.
And nobody wants all the sudden for there to be ten million criminal charges filed all over the US by people who are angry because their neighbors dog took a dump in their yard.
But the procedure and process and administration of the law cannot be interpreted in such a way that it favors anybody in particular, or that it in any way denies some party Due Process and substantive rights.
As I said, I’m not an attorney and have no desire to be one. But I have tens of thousands of pages worth of info on law, and have read alot of it. I have the entire U. S. Reports series (Supreme Court decisions going back to abt 1778). I have the complete collection of the United States Statutes at Large. I have the Annotated Constitution, which is The United States Constitution, Analysis and Interpretation, authorized by Congress and prepared by the Congressional Research Service, based entirely on the Constitution and the Supreme Court decisions that have interpreted constitutional issues, 2500+ pages of analysis.
And lots more than that.
So.
I stand by my assertion.
Just look at how their beloved "leader"(?) dealt with Israel/Netanyahu???
No, the ONLY remedy is a Honduras moment/action!!!
Shall be interesting to see what Loretta Fuddy comes up with on June 24 at 10:00 AM, hmmmm???
You’ll love this...
EXPLOSIVE INTERVIEW W/ DEBT COLLECTOR WHO FOUND OBAMA ALIAS HARRISON J BOUNELL RELATED TO MICHELLE O
Rick ^ | May 19, 2011
Posted on Thursday, May 26, 2011 10:44:09 AM by Hotlanta Mike
EXPLOSIVE INTERVIEW WITH DEBT COLLECTOR WHO FOUND OBAMA ALIAS HARRISON J BOUNELL WHO IS RELATED TO MICHELLE OBAMA
Barack Obama / Barry Sotero / Harrison J Bounel Blatant Real Estate / Tax Fraud?
LONG LEGGED MAC DADDY has even more names.
Harrison J Bounell J Harrison Bounell 5046 South Greenwood Avenue Chicago, Illinois 60615 This address where real estate fraud has been committed is owned by Judge Jane L Stuart. Obamanation’s book keeper Esquire Harvey Weinberg cooked the books on this fraudulent Real Estate deal for Obamanation at the tune of about 1.23 million dollars.
SS#042-68-4425 Real Estate and Tax Fraud Involving Northern Trust Company and Fanny Mae. Obamanation has 58 addresses across the country where he has lived in various states.
Audio (3 parts) links of interview from Rick at True News.
Trunews.com Rick Wiles
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OyJVgISDZ94&feature=feedu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PEUNVrHHGmc&NR=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIuzu2VZuJk&NR=1
That's not a very nice thing to say about Hotlanta Mike.
Sure he's only been here a few months and has focused on keeping the one issue alive that helps Obama.
But still...
But in this case, it's unlikely to happen. Why would BHO want Corsi to shut up? Corsi working to get white supremacists on the birther wagon is an early Christmas present for Obama.
But what else can you expect from a FINO, or rather also a SP???
Seems definitely more YOUR goals than H.M's!!!
Don't abbreviate Harris' name like it was a rank. He was a DC gangbanger whose first name was "Lieutenant," who went by "LQ" and whose street name was "Foots."
The issue helps Bounell you say?
Slowly the feces seeps to the surface from the sump pump that is oversaturated.
As Dick Nixon once said “Americans have a righth to know whether their President is a crook”. I agree with that.
By the way, I know danamco has my back.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.