Thanks again, HM. Yes, it is my total conviction that the ‘abstract’ Barry presented is in no way the original document. After all, Fukino said the original was half handwritten, and the Obots have told me I-don’t-know-how-many-times that Fukino is the gold standard. [Not that I ever believed them.] But there is no redacting what Abercrombie said. He said he actually saw ‘something written down’, ‘a notation’. How can anyone imagine the wacky doc Barry submitted matches that description???
I just hope, if Fuddy tries to wriggle out of the subpoena, the Obots line up to apologize to me. I’ve been called a lot of names for not taking The Won’s—not to mention Fukino’s—word as ontological truth. If Fuddy tries to sidestep this golden opportunity to to put it all out there, I will expect more than a few retractions.