Thanks for info on the justice.
I do think that the “stumbling” characterization is valid (okay, maybe the stitches thing is unfair). I don’t think we’ve ever had a POTUS who has blatantly distorted facts with impunity the way that Obama has these past two years. What will Daniels do when Obama and the MSM flat out lie about everything in 2012- will he vocally attack any of this, or will he humbly stand aside and view Obama as the “fine fellow” as McCain did?
The stumbling characterization may be valid as a subsidiary issue, something that tips the scales when all else is close to equal. But we need meatier stuff, such as the supreme court nomination, and other viable decisions in office.
Keep in mind, comparisons to Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, may work with some of us, but there are many today of voting age who wouldn’t have a clue as to what we mean.