Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitch Daniels Is Unelectable
Riehl World View ^ | 5/20/2011 | Dan Riehl

Posted on 05/21/2011 9:03:11 AM PDT by Qbert

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-119 next last
To: John W

apples and oranges.

mitch is a closet rino.

sarah is not a rino.


21 posted on 05/21/2011 9:28:26 AM PDT by ken21 (liberal + rino progressive media hate palin, bachman, cain...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Qbert
The GOP can not afford a 2012 nominee who has consistently demonstrated an uncanny ability to say and do precisely the wrong thing to the wrong people at the wrong time. If anything, Daniels makes Romney's relatively weak political judgment look strong by comparison. The Indiana Governor is unelectable and, frankly, I'm not interested in hearing what a great conservative he is, allegedly.

??? What is this guy talking about? Conservatism doesn't matter? My concern with Daniels is that he may not be willing to fight hard enough but he is certainly electable.

22 posted on 05/21/2011 9:29:31 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aria
when was the last time the shorter candidate won?

2004.

23 posted on 05/21/2011 9:30:25 AM PDT by Charles Henrickson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ken21

Disagree.


24 posted on 05/21/2011 9:32:28 AM PDT by John W (Natural-born US citizen since 1955)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: John W
Mitch and Sarah seem to generate a lot of vitriol. Wonder why?

They're both pretty short.

25 posted on 05/21/2011 9:33:44 AM PDT by Charles Henrickson ("James Madison, Father of the Constitution, FORGET IT, you're too short to be president!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Qbert
With friends like Conor with one N, Mitch Daniels probably doesn't need enemies within the conservative base. -- Dan Riehl

I didn't realize onomastics and orthography were going to be issues this time around.

Mitch Daniels can probably withstand enemies who spell "real" with an I and an H.

Seriously, mocking how people spell their names isn't exactly taking the high road to respect as a pundit.

Ideology aside, if we can learn anything from watching John McCain stumble and bumble his way through the 2008 general election, it should be that a self-destructive, not truly ready for prime-time, ultimately uninspiring and unsympathetic figure will not do well against Obama.

If the right candidate isn't out there, he or she isn't out there.

Sure, another McCain or Dole would lose. So would another Goldwater -- and by a larger margin.

Daniels is clearly not the most inspiring of imaginable candidates, but if you're waiting for Superman or Superwoman, you'll be waiting a long time.

26 posted on 05/21/2011 9:34:06 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

Thanks for info on the justice.

I do think that the “stumbling” characterization is valid (okay, maybe the stitches thing is unfair). I don’t think we’ve ever had a POTUS who has blatantly distorted facts with impunity the way that Obama has these past two years. What will Daniels do when Obama and the MSM flat out lie about everything in 2012- will he vocally attack any of this, or will he humbly stand aside and view Obama as the “fine fellow” as McCain did?


27 posted on 05/21/2011 9:35:49 AM PDT by Qbert ("The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry" - William F. Buckley, Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Take this as a cue, Mitch, and get out now. DON’T LET THE DOOR HIT YOU IN THE ASS.


28 posted on 05/21/2011 9:36:07 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W
Mitch and Sarah seem to generate a lot of vitriol. Wonder why?

Mitch? Vitriol? More than Mitt or Huck or Rudy or Newt?

His people will be very happy to hear that he generates any reaction at all.

29 posted on 05/21/2011 9:39:58 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: x

“Daniels is clearly not the most inspiring of imaginable candidates, but if you’re waiting for Superman or Superwoman, you’ll be waiting a long time.”

Says who?


30 posted on 05/21/2011 9:40:54 AM PDT by Qbert ("The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry" - William F. Buckley, Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
The Commission gave him three tip top people (based on their credentials). Now if Mitch had undertaken a bit of waterboarding he might well have discovered how utterly alien the candidates were.

I don't know if he can reject the candidates and demand more of them, but like any job selection where you depend on a review committee's judgment you will quite regularly get a parade of people whose real abilities lie somewhere else than in the job you are interviewing them for.

I think elections are much better. They help widen the electorate.

31 posted on 05/21/2011 9:42:19 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

...thing is, much of the opposition to Daniels comes precisely from his ideology...and the lack thereof is why the beltway loves him so much. If you nominate a staunch pro-American conservative like Cain or Bachmann, it becomes much harder for big government globalists in the Republican party to ply their trade.


32 posted on 05/21/2011 9:42:39 AM PDT by Yet_Again
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

Oh yes -forgot about that, but it was John effing Kerry. Besides, W wasn’t that much shorter.

I’d like our shorter than Obama candidate to be Sarah.


33 posted on 05/21/2011 9:42:43 AM PDT by Aria ( "If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

The stumbling characterization may be valid as a subsidiary issue, something that tips the scales when all else is close to equal. But we need meatier stuff, such as the supreme court nomination, and other viable decisions in office.

Keep in mind, comparisons to Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, may work with some of us, but there are many today of voting age who wouldn’t have a clue as to what we mean.


34 posted on 05/21/2011 9:43:35 AM PDT by bcsco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Qbert
Says who?

The polls, for one.

35 posted on 05/21/2011 9:44:19 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I don’t disagree with you on elections. But the fact that a commission gives a governor 3, or 4, or whatever, candidates for a position, it’s still that governor’s responsibility to look at the facts and come up with a wise decision. And if the qualifications aren’t sound (or debatable on issues), then the governor shouldn’t be afraid to toss them all out and tell the commission to go back to the drawing board. There’s too much to lose, otherwise.


36 posted on 05/21/2011 9:46:38 AM PDT by bcsco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: x

Huh? What polls?


37 posted on 05/21/2011 9:49:22 AM PDT by Qbert ("The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry" - William F. Buckley, Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Watch this: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/02/11/gov_mitch_daniels_debt_is_the_new_red_menace.html

Now try and tell me that Mitch Daniels is “unelectable”.

If he did half as well in a debate with the current GOP field, he would zoom to the top contender over night.


38 posted on 05/21/2011 9:49:59 AM PDT by TruthHound ("He who does not punish evil commands it to be done." --Leonardo da Vinci)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

I mean stumbling more in the verbal sense.


39 posted on 05/21/2011 9:53:59 AM PDT by Qbert ("The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry" - William F. Buckley, Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: John W
Mitch and Sarah seem to generate a lot of vitriol. Wonder why?

Sarah Palin has more vitriol thrown at her in one day than Mitch Daniels has received in his lifetime.

Last I checked the beltway elite and lib media love Daniels.
40 posted on 05/21/2011 9:55:23 AM PDT by nhwingut (Palin '12... Accept No Other)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-119 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson