Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: possum john
I’m not a supporter of the ethanol programs, but I do find it interesting the way that terminology gets used. One man’s subsidy is another man’s tax break.

There are actaully no subsidies (direct paymwents to ethanol producers) for ethanol. Congress has provided the motor fuel industry with a tax incentive for blending ethanol with gasoline in the form of 45 cents per gallon of ethanol tax credit known as the Volumetric Ethanol Excise Tax Credit. The tariff on imported ethanol is essentailly a tax taking in revenue, not a subsidy paying out benefits.

Removal of the programs would result in a tax increase resulting from the removal of the blenders credit. The removal of the tariff would be a tax cut, but as others have noted, we are currently a next exporter of ethanol.
11 posted on 05/19/2011 7:15:07 AM PDT by NC28203
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NC28203
One man’s subsidy is another man’s tax break.

One man's subsidy is another man's investment!

12 posted on 05/19/2011 7:38:26 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson