[Tex-Con-Man]

Why? Because I'm not a birther?

Because I consider Farah a hoax huckster?

My definition of conservatism doesn't include believing every idiotic conspiracy that comes along.

I value conservatism over birtherism.

You should try it.

[greenhornet68]

Come on, Tex-Con-Man. We’re waiting for your response. Answer raygunfan’s question:
...show us the proven false stories where he was taken to court and lost....or was forced to just recant, because of an error, not intentional malice, etc...

[STARWISE]

Getting preachy to fellow conservatives who do their own extensive research, formulating their own concerns and probabilities ... may want to put this on your shopping list.

[alstewartfan]

Read Farah’s series of articles last week exposing the “b/c” as a fraud, and THEN explain to us why you still think that HE is the hoaxter, not Obama. Sorry, TCM, but if you knew the reasons for skepticism, you’d realize that you are clueless on this one. Bob

[Beckwith]

Why? Because I'm not a birther?

No becuase you're a jerk!

[monday]

Check out this link and try thinking for yourself instead of running with the herd.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s9StxsFllY&feature=player_embedded

[taraytarah]

My definition of conservatism doesn't include believing every idiotic conspiracy that comes along.

I value conservatism over birtherism.

The conservatives I know don't believe a word out of the liar-in-chief's mouth. His presented history is chronicled entirely in unverified autobiography. This sole documentation of his associations, actions, and whereabouts demands thorough and determined investigation. Without validation, obama's life story remains a simple political publication, with as much biographical value as Alice in Wonderland. Farah/Corsi are intelligent enough to understand this.