Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Liberty1970
I would think scammers would target the easiest audience (gullible individuals), and the small size/capacity of individual demo E-cats would support such a direction. Instead they are going with larger installations presumably for industrial/commercial operation.

The device reportedly occasionally emits small amounts of gamma, and needs shielding. Residential use will not happen for a while until it is proven safe for unattended home use.

If it needs an attendant to monitor it, then it needs to be industrial-scale (minimum multi-MW) for it to be cost-justifiable. This is a good sign, because trying to scam major corporations on something like this is not something a flim-flam guy would try.

13 posted on 05/17/2011 6:33:46 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625

Rats, yes, gamma radiation would be a problem for home use. I would expect the gov’t to basically outlaw home installation (and use in motor vehicles, etc.) if there is a gamma radiation risk, and with some justification. I wonder if the design can be refined and fail-safed to ensure that gamma radiation cannot be produced? Let’s hope so.


14 posted on 05/17/2011 7:19:01 AM PDT by Liberty1970 (Liberty, not License. Freedom, not Slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson