You keep playing at “yes, but” with everyone who’s been working on this for years, so how about you tell us how it happened.
“so how about you tell us how it happened.”
I honestly don’t know and the burden of proof is on those who claim to know, not me. It’s like a birth in Kenya. I’ve raised many objections to that theory that are based in common sense and easily available empirical evidence. So your question is the equivalent of a Kenyan birther responding to my skepticism by saying, “OK, you’re so smart: you tell us how his birth in Kenya happened.”
Fact: no one can explain how BHO would have legitimately gotten a CT-based SSN.
Fact: he has and continues to use exactly such an SSN.
Fact: he’s apparently spent considerable resources to successfully suppress many documents, including official government documents (e.g., the stonewalling of efforts to get Ann Dunham’s passport history/records seems to be one of the more blatant efforts). Yet somehow he HASN’T managed to keep a lid on this SSN.
I don’t pretend to be an expert, but it’s hard to see an innocent explanation in the above. But that is a far cry from claiming I know what the explanation is. I’m not trying to be deliberately obtuse. I’m trying to be honest in reporting the aspects of these various theories that don’t ring true to me.
If these theories have holes from the perspective of someone like me who isn’t at this juncture inclined to give BHO the benefit of the doubt, imagine how much harder it is to persuade others more neutral than perhaps I am that these theories should be taken seriously.