[Girlene]

The issue to most folks is about why there's a madman on the court. It's not what he's saying, it's "where did that guy come from"?

Okay, I get it. I'm interested in the ruling, you are interested in the judge that produced that ruling. Both are relevant issues. Regardless of whether the judge is relieved, gone, whathaveyou, his ruling stands in Indiana. That is my concern until this is taken up by the SCOTUS.

[muawiyah]

To the degree the court's ruling conflicts with USSC decisions regarding the Fourth Amendment it's null and void.

I bet your concern is with the warrants, but it should be the right to be secure in your possessions ~ to wit, the right of the woman to call the cops for help!