Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah
“The court's decision arises out of a case in which a husband and wife were arguing outside their apartment. When police arrived to investigate, the couple retreated into their domicile. The husband attempted to close the door, but one officer forced his way into the apartment. The husband shoved the intruder against a wall, whereupon a second officer used a stun gun on the man and arrested him.”

If the woman was in danger of harm the officers had a duty to intervene. If this was a simple argument between a husband and wife and there was no danger, this is most definitely a 4th amendment issue. It was a 3-2 decision.

34 posted on 05/16/2011 10:33:59 AM PDT by cpdiii (Deckhand, Roughneck, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist, Iconoclast: THE CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: cpdiii
Nope, the guy had been OUTSIDE when told the cops he no longer lived there.

The woman had called the cops ~ they didn't just wander in imagining they'd be investigating something. They answered a call for help.

It turned into a kidnapping. He had no goods there. She pleaded with him to open the door and get out of the way.

He got off the hook with three minor felony charges. He should have gone up the river for life eh!

38 posted on 05/16/2011 11:00:44 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: cpdiii
BTW, SHE CALLED THE COPS the first chance she got alone away from this guy. SHE CALLED. THEY ANSWERED.

There was no unlawful entry.

39 posted on 05/16/2011 11:02:33 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson