American women acting like the women media success women think American women should be. Should be good reinforcement of my preference for imports.
It sounds quite missable.
I saw it advertised the other day, it looked like it might be funny, then saw it was rated “R.”
At that point I realized the “funny” would be largely scatological, porny, cussy, and revolting.
So I knew then I’d skip it.
This looks like THE HANGOVER for chicks.
Should be an interesting experiment on women because they’ve been programmed on chickflicks & romcoms that men are always heavily flawed, can’t control our urges, and it’s their job to teach us cavemen on how to be better. If there is a female character whose mean and sleeps around, she’s always doing it because she’s got an alpha-male complex and/or was sweet at one time, but got screwed over by a man and drove her to be this. They’re always the ones that at the end of the movie bested by the lead female.
The uncomfortable laughter reported at this movie makes me believe this movie won’t be a major hit like Hangover was.
Actually this isn’t true the gross out movie when CO ED in 2002 with a movie called “The Sweetest Thing”, it had Cameron Diaz and Christina Applegate, and Selma Blair.
Premise is pretty much two happily single young party gals and best friends, one far more cynical of love than the other.. of course the more cynical falls for a guy big, and then they cross the country to see him, and calamity ensues.
It pretty much didn’t gover over great at the Box Office, with a production budget of $43 Million and Domestic Gross of a bit over 25 Million. Overall worldwide it did make money, with gross worldwide revenues of a little over $68.5 Million.
Maybe it was too soon for audiences to accept the female raunchie movie, or maybe it was simply the writing wasn’t as strong as it should have been... and frankly there are parts of the movie that are just a mess.. however there is no doubt that this was the first real co-ed gross out movie, at least mass marketed anyway.
This was a scene that never made it to the released film, but was released on the DVD extras and is probably what the film is best remembered for... this is not work safe.. but it should give you an idea of the level of raunch this thing was going for.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tWfosqBsOY&feature=grec_index
Idiocracy, here we come:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czSegPchDmU
I saw a sneak peak of this film and it was not good. They tried to cram in as much stuff in a two hour time frame. It should have been shorter. It seemed like a rough cut and there was hardly any music. I think most of the budget was spend having Wilson Phillips perform on at end of the movie.
This movie reminds me of The Borgias on Showtime in that there is no character in the series that has any redeemable qualities. On the other hand in Camelot on Starz, King Arthur, though flawed is maturing and gaining wisdom.
I’m sure women will watch this. I can ‘t believe what people watch, but they do.
If the networks and movies had to program for the women I care about, 80% of what they do would not be there.
When I first saws the trailer for the movie, all I could think was,
“Oh, great! Yes, let’s have a movie about women behaving boorishly, because we certainly need to see more examples of classless, tasteless, immoral people!!”/sarc
I have had enough of “raunchy”. And, chickflicks? *dry heaves*
http://www.themoviespoiler.com synopis spoilers without the need to even waste more than 5 minutes on a movie.