We are discussing the US Constitution, not England. Since the King is not elected there is no parallel point.
I asked you, why does the Constitution draw a distiction between “citizen” and “natural born”? I posted what a US Supreme Court Justice wrote in a majority opinion. Do you doubt that Vattel was a source for the founders? Is it your assertion they were merely sloppy when they used NBC for the President, but only citizen for senators and representatives?
“Do you doubt that Vattel was a source for the founders? Is it your assertion they were merely sloppy when they used NBC for the President, but only citizen for senators and representatives?”
Vattel was not a source for citizenship laws. Vattel argued it all followed the father, which has never been US law. We have followed the English example and used birthplace.
A naturalized citizen has every right except this - he cannot run fro President.