LOL. So? The amoung of junk has been introduced into birther lawsuits as "evidence" is staggering.
This is yet another example.
I guarantee you that this junk lawsuit will be dismissed post haste, just like every other birther lawsuit.
I guarantee you that this junk lawsuit will be dismissed post haste, just like every other birther lawsuit.
Yada yada yada anti-birther.
You stated that he was “a hack who claims he’s a document expert quibbling over the positioning of certain letters.” So what’s the basis of YOUR expertise to prove your statement correct?