Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Tex-Con-Man
You didn't answer my question, so with respect I repeat it:

Is presenting a photocopy or scan of a physical notarized paper legal document in a court of law a legally valid procedure or not?

77 posted on 05/06/2011 9:12:34 AM PDT by Exmil_UK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: Exmil_UK
You didn't answer my question, so with respect I repeat it:

Is presenting a photocopy or scan of a physical notarized paper legal document in a court of law a legally valid procedure or not?

Free Republic is a site dedicated to the promotion of conservatism not birtherism. Additionally, I am free to respond any way I see fit.

My opinion on the BC authenticity and/or it's legal validity is so irrelevant as to be completely pointless. I've said from the beginning, the people birthers have to convince have so far been totally unconvinced.

If the BC is a fraud...take it to Congress. How's that going so far?

If you think Obama's ineligible because his dad was Kenyan? ...convince the Heritage foundation...so far, they don't agree with birthers.

The States Attorneys General have shown a bold willingness to go after the Obama administration for, among other things, Obamacare, but are completely uninterested in the so-called "fraud" surrounding the President's birth status. Clearly they aren't afraid of the administration..so maybe...just maybe there is no merit to birtherism.

87 posted on 05/06/2011 2:53:02 PM PDT by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson