Are you admitting the earlier one was a forgery?
Obama’s front groups disagree on the hospital name.
The serial number conflicts with those issued just a
few days from the date on this one.
For you to accept that this is not a forgery requires you to suspend belief on all the conflicts it contains.
Since you have suspended any belief of these conflicts, you have to be a Barry Soetero follower.
You are drinking the Koolaid.
These conflicts are either things you can't explain because of lack of understanding, or things with reasonable explanations you choose to ignore. It takes a leap of the imagination to turn anomalies into a massive conspiracy involving faked documents.
Duh. That’s the point.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
And no.
Your ignorance does not mandate any failings on my part.
I call them “The Believers!”
Cue the Monkees’ song: “I'm a Believer!”
Then I saw Barry's face, now I'm a believer
Not a trace of doubt in my mind
I'm in love, I'm a believer
I couldn't leave him if I tried
Since that number can be applied at any time to any form where that area is blank it MEANS NOTHING outside of the workflow.
Some Freepers came up with a need for the number on the form so that proper statistical measurement could be made ~ they were selecting only the odd, or even, forms on different days.
What blew that idea out of the water was the statistical measurement was claimed to be made on only HALF of the forms.
That's easy ~ take a stack ~ put one on the left, one on the right, repeat. Flip a coin to select the left stack or the right stack. Hand it to the data clerk.
That's as good as it gets boys and girls.
But why half? That was not addressed. I think that's where the story fell apart and interest waned.