The RINO’s threw the Constitution out the window when they cut the deal not to contest Obama’s NBC status in exchange for Dems and MSM (NY Times) dropping challenge to McCain.
Elites of both parties want to protect eligibility of marketable candidates (Jindal, Rubio, future Democratic anchor baby nominees) too valuable to be rendered ineligible by “loopholes” (as Obama put it when endorsing Senate Resolution 511). The NBC clause is a “loophole” to these folks.
The argument is that we know how the investigation would turn out, so we wouldn’t win, but would cause political damage to our side.
What’s the point of raising the issue of his NBC status if your legal conclusion is that he is NBC because of statutory rape?
I admit I hadn’t thought of that, because I’ve been hung up on the biological aspect of NBC, not considering that it would be a legal thing. Thus, I have asked before whether the child of a single mother who doesn’t know the father (such as a sperm donor) could be President under the NBC rule, since he wouldn’t be able to prove “both parents” were NBC.
But logically, if the guy’s father was a sperm donor, there wouldn’t be a “tie” to another country if that father was foreign.
That is what Leo is finally affirming, IMO.
Constitutionalists, IMO, will support this interpretation.
The problem facing Constitutionalists is that Obama’s supposed declaration implying (while not stating) that he WAS a dual citizen of the UK and Kenya at birth creates the appearance of an unconstitutional legal precedent!
This false precedent, that a dual citizen at birth is eligible to be president, must not be allowed to stand and must be contested to the bitter end, even if it means Barry must be declared to be a bastard at the end of the process.