[deport]

In other words, you are looking a scanned, possibly multiply-scanned, document, pointing out random anomalies, and arguing that these random anomalies are evidence of a well-planned but poorly-executed conspiracy. But with no explanation as to WHY someone would generate these particular anomalies, or how they play a part in the conspiracy, you have nothing.

---

What I'm more interested in is the data submitted as coming from the records on file in HI the actual data? I'm not interested how it got here be via a photocopy, scanned doc, hand written on a scratch piece of paper, microfilche or whatever. Is it the data that is on file in HI? If so then all these anomalies are just that anomalies but don't impact the data as being legit if it is what's on file.

After all this has a stamp certifying it as being legit and Loretta Fuddy, the Director of Health in her letter stated she personally witnessed the copying and attested to its authenticity.

http://global.nationalreview.com/dest/2011/04/27/birth_certificate_correspondence_5da9a1a825978db6b52f335642604a2e.pdf

[little jeremiah]

Deport has a link to a pdf document of correspondence between Zero, his lawyer and HI.

Hawaii - a criminal enterprise disguised as a State.

[little jeremiah]

What’s the Global National Review?

[CharlesWayneCT]

But Loretta is part of the conspiracy. She’s willing to lose her job and go to jail to falsify records that don’t prove anything and are actually forgeries built by the Obama white house with no actual documents from Hawaii, by high-level members of the administration who are also all ready to go to jail and lose their jobs to fake a document that wasn’t needed and that is nothing we were already told and hadn’t already been accepted by a majority of the people.

There was never a good reason for Obama not to release his certificate, but “making conservatives look stupid” was a pretty good reason.