Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Winston

According to Steve, IBM didn’t produce a typewriter with proportional fonts until 1966. Is it plausible that the BC was typed on some other brand of typewriter that had proportional fonts? I guess it must be, since we see the same proportional font on the Nordyke twins’ BC. If it’s legit on their BC, then it must be legit on Obama’s too.

And I think you’re right about the kerning. When you look through the whole document you see misalignments in the characters that are very typical of what you get with a manual typewriter. Occasionally you’ll see what looks like a kerned pair, but just as often you’ll see a pair where the spacing is wider than normal and in some cases it’s a vertical misalignment. So to me the kerning argument goes out the window too.

So I’m back to thinking the conspiracy theory doesn’t hold water.


231 posted on 05/07/2011 9:46:21 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]


To: Yardstick
According to Steve, IBM didn’t produce a typewriter with proportional fonts until 1966. Is it plausible that the BC was typed on some other brand of typewriter that had proportional fonts? I guess it must be, since we see the same proportional font on the Nordyke twins’ BC. If it’s legit on their BC, then it must be legit on Obama’s too.

Yes, there were typewriters with proportional fonts starting in the 1940s.

232 posted on 05/07/2011 1:43:02 PM PDT by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson