I assume that's an ad hominem attack, which would indicate that you have nothing of any substance whatsoever to say about any point that I've made.
Its a reflection on this administration not you. Everything they do they screw up. Sure you and everyone else has made some points, but the fact is nothing has shown that it is not a forgery, only that it some of these phenomenons may be created by the software, not that it was crated by the software.
It boils down to needing an old fahioned forensic examination by a questioned document examiner who can examine the actualopaper, ink, sn poddibly determine which ink is the same and not, which typewriter signature is the same or not , age of the paper maybe even age of the ink...then of course the details of the document, including the signatures and verify from the hospital if he was born there and who his doctor was. That is what will put this to rest and nothing less...unless someone breaks to it being a forgery..