You’re too deceitful to continue discussing this with. I am defending the ones who have found the layering, not dismissing them. The issue is the fact that layers prove it is a composite and not what your barry bassturd has claimed it to be. I do not know who fabricated the scam. And your insistence in trying to convolute the simple facts is duly noted, obamanoid.
Your the one who is pushing a conspiracy theory well past it’s expiration date. But I’m not telling you to stop believing. I’m just explaining why the conspiracy makes no sense, and what questions you need to answer to hope to have any sensible argument.
You seem to think the argument is about whether there are layers, although I’m past trying to figure out exactly what, if any, argument you actually are trying to make.
Others have created layers by scanning a single document. You have yet to show any reason why they are wrong; you haven’t explained why those layers couldn’t have been introduced by the scanning done by the Hawaii officials, or by the secretary who scanned the document for the white house.
Others haven’t explained why the President of the United States would be taking time out of his busy golf schedule to scan and modify his own birth certificate.
I see no evidence to prove the document is a scam, and not simply the result of a scan, maybe through a program with the settings on a different setting than would have been appropriate for a picture of a document.
I’m not ignorant of scanning, but I haven’t relied on, or made any arguments, based on any personal knowledge (I rarely do here, especially about things related to my work, which I don’t discuss here). I’ve seen statements unrefuted by the conspirascists by people who have no reason to lie that I take as the truth, as they are first-hand accounts of what they have done.
On the other hand, I’m not arguing that the document is real. How would I know that it was real? I’m simply arguing that the layering has another explanation, so those saying it proves conspiracy better explain how the layering, how the mucking around with the document, advances the cause of those who are supposed to have been messing with the document.
You seem to be arguing, but again I’m not sure anymore what you are arguing, that you are NOT pushing a particular hypothesis about it being a scam, just that “layers prove it is a composite and not what your barry bassturd has claimed it to be”.
I’m not sure what you mean by that, as I haven’t seen Obama claim it wasn’t a composite; he hasn’t said a thing about that. Layers don’t prove it’s a composite, since others have created layers with a single scan that have similar features. But you don’t seem to be saying how being a composite makes it a scam — I presume by “composite” you mean they took two different documents or a document and other work and layered them together, which I find to be an absurd premise, and being so requires some explanation of why someone would do that, what goal would it serve.
I’m sorry that it takes a lot more words to make rational explanations than it does to simply make ad hominen attacks. It would be much easier to simply respond by calling you name and dismissing your words.
It’s like bedlam tonight.
Full of 0bamhorroids.