Don't call him lazy. He only has proven that the doc was altered. Why should he tell you WHY? He has no idea why!! This is not about explanations. That is something we American people, Obama's boss, have very little of, when it comes to his actions.
WE DON'T KNOW WHY. That is what we need to ask Obama and Hawaii. You're wasting your time criticizing the original poster. No one here needs to jump to conclusions why Obama's hiding things. It's up to Obama to explain that to US!
The poster has offered a hypothesis, that the document is a forgery. For evidence, he presents the document layers with the anomalies he lists, including the "r" in a different format than the rest of the word "Barack".
But the evidence itself doesn't prove the hypothesis. IN order to prove, or advance, the hypothesis, you need to explain why the anomalies indicate a forgery -- and to do that, you have to explain to what end they would have to replace the "r" in their forgery.
For example, in the Rathergate scandal, they had proportional-font. And the reason was that the document was generated in Word, and someone put the document in WOrd, and showed that they matched. It wasn't that the document looked funny, it was that there were specific problems with the document that could be EXPLAINED by it being a forgery, and it made sense.
Replacing the "r" makes no sense. If they were building a document, they would never build it the way the layers are put together. It would be much easier to do the job. Plus, they would only build something if they had available only a similar document, and had to replace things on the document with the Obama information.
But the document we are looking at is certified by the public official in Hawaii; it would have had his full name on the document. Why would the Obama white house take a perfectly good name on a document, and replace an "r" with a different "r"?
Given that there is a reasonable non-conspiratorial explanation for how this could happen (scanning process), those who argue that this was evidence of forgery do owe the world an explanation of WHY a forger would do what they are seeing.
So the question remains, why replace the 'r'?