Are there records showing a court ruling on someone being a natural born citizen. There must be a case in our legal history somewhere!!
Are there records showing a court ruling on someone being a natural born citizen. There must be a case in our legal history somewhere!!
In the comments section:
http://drkatesview.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/obama-cant-defeat-his-own-strawman/#more-6093
drkate :
or hidden away!
Keep in mind that WE ALREADY KNOW THE UNAMBIGUOUS LEGAL DEFINITION OF THE TERM-OF-ART natural born Citizen!! It was put into the law of this land by the United States Supreme Court decision in the 1875 Minor v. Happersett case and has never been overturned (but even has been recognized and confirmed in other cases since that time). At the time of the decision in Minor it was almost 100 years after the nations founding and even now 230-plus years later it still means the same thing. One simplified way of stating this is born in the US of 2 US citizen parents.
The actual 1875 Supreme Court opinion in Minor v Happersett:
The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. (emphasis added)
This means the simple born in America of 2 citizen parents still is the active, pertinent law of our land. It should in conjunction with A2S1C5 of the Constitution, be the law that determines Obamas fate of course he and the Flying Monkeys wont agree; theyd rather just ignore or rewrite the Constitution, but I wouldnt.