Posted on 04/29/2011 5:56:42 AM PDT by Alaphiah123
What if there never was Global warming, what if it has always been Global Weather Warfare? Recent super tornados dubbed “Killer Tornadoes” have cut a swath across seven southern states of the United States. Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia,East Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee and Virginia all have been hit by abnormally sized and super strengthened tornadoes costing nearly 300 lives and estimates of billions of dollars of property damage. (see here, here and here)
But what if these recent tornadoes and hurricane Katrina in 2005 were not simply capricious acts of nature, what if these devastating destructive acts were the surgical strikes of al Qaeda or another enemy of the United States of America. An enemy with money and technology to control the weather and what’s more, use those resources against it’s enemy the United States of America.
(Excerpt) Read more at creatingorwellianworld-view-alaphiah.blogspot.com ...
Great questions.
Maybe some either are or are mimicking
globalist shills . . .
who chronically for 60+ years have used hostile derision and ridicule as one of their major strategies
—in disinformation efforts
—in personal character assassination efforts.
I don’t know what the
—RUSH to copy such technics is.
—INTENSITY is from.
What is sooooooooooooooo threatening from IDEAS, POSSIBILITIES, PLAUSIBILITIES, FACTS, to generate
SUCH EMOTION SOAKED
HOSTILITY AND REFLEX DIATRIBES?
Curious.
Sociologically and psychologically curious.
If the count was correct, this will be the record for the most tornadoes in a 24 hour period. (160)
willful ignoring of
Dr Agnew's OIL FIELD EXPERIMENTAL evidence?
What is it with this
. . . ignoring the scientific data that at least major quakes are preceded by certain ionospheric phenomena?
And PRETENDING that folks paying fair-minded attention to such data
are the blind ignorant ones?
Is there some personal agenda with such knee-jerk hostile assaults?
Or is it some visceral angst, terror that cannot tolerate even imagining such things could be true?
IF THOSE OF US CONSIDERING SUCH EVIDENCE CHARITABLY ARE SUCH RANK IGNORANT PSYCHOTICS . . .
HOW DOES THAT THREATEN NAYSAYERS SO INTENSELY? ARE THEY THAT INSECURE?
PUZZLING.
Once young, excited minds that have become stale and closed, forever convinced there is nothing beyond their fragile and selected reality.
Fails
according to folks demonstrating next to zero fair-mindedness . . . and who are skillful at ignoring a considerable amount of evidence.
Dr Brooks Agnew is not an ignorant psychotic ignorant with nothing to show for his 30 years of research.
His illustration demonstration was not idiotic hocus pocus.
There have been other illustrations/demonstrations that are not idiotic.
I’ve never said that.
I’ve never implied that.
The most I’ve indicated in that direction is that
SOME SUCH MAY WELL BE paid shills.
That’s merely obvious and logical.
Well, that’s proof then that it might just be easier to control the weather. ;-)
I guess one of your favorite strategies is
GUILT BY EXAGGERATION?
or is it
Guilt due to not agreeing with you?
If they’re heating up the earth’s atmosphere, they’d be REDUCING the number of tornadoes.
Tornado formation occurs with the temperature and humidity contrast are most extreme, conditions that exist in the spring time as the arctic is just starting to lose more heat than it’s gaining, and yet the tropics are very warm from the sun’s path northward.
The atmospheric pressure in the ionosphere is 10% of sea level. It’s simply not going to have much of an effect if a small patch of almost non-existent atmosphere gets a few degrees C warmer than it is, if it makes that much difference.
Not buying today.
And some day, that record will be broken somewhere.
I thought
that in the
SCIENCE OF MATHEMATICS
SOME is NOT EQUAL to 100%.
100% IS EQUAL TO 100%
I thought y’all were better at math than I am.
But you conspiracy nuts apparently don’t care who you slime with your insinuations.
We’d have to work hard to surpass the naysayers in that dept.
That very well could be......
I like to discuss the plausible.
Not the impossible.
>>>Guilt due to not agreeing with you?
That’s your domain. I’ll leave you to it.
I understand y’all’s rationale and evidence.
I don’t see folks on y’all’s side even looking at 1/10th the evidence on the other side remotely fair-mindedly.
There’s tons of government documents verifying such goals, patents, etc. for decades.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.