Obama’s COLB is missing this text at the bottom along with signatures that is present on the Nordyke COLB:
“THIS CERTIFIES THAT THE ABOVE IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL RECORD ON FILE IN THE RESEARCH, PLANNING AND STATISTICS OFFICE
HAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH”
Instead Obama’s has Onaka’s signature stamp indicating that it may also be an ABSTRACT.
When the Nordyke COLB was requested, the language regarding being a true and correct copy was probably added by the machine that printed the copy. There would be no reason for the film template in the machine to say "copy or abstract" since the machine would not be printing anything but copies. By contrast, today's practice is to print abstracts most of the time, but to print copies on occasion, and to mark each copy or abstract with a stamp. It's having one stamp for "copy or abstract" makes more sense than having one stamp for copies and one for abstracts, especially when it should be obvious whether any given document is a copy or abstract.