Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: KC Burke

YouTube turned off the comment section of the video posting.

“Adding comments has been disabled for this video.” Interesting!


42 posted on 04/27/2011 3:09:56 PM PDT by WellyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: WellyP

That is a good thing as I see it.

It would be hilarious for this to be found an demonstrable fraud, but, alas, it is more likely that many so earnestly want to find such that we are chasing shadows in the mists.


43 posted on 04/27/2011 3:13:02 PM PDT by KC Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: WellyP

Someone didn’t check this:

Hawaii Births 1961
1961 Vital Statistics — Race And Color

According to the U. S. Public Health Service, births in the United States in 1961 were classified for vital statistics into white, Negro, American Indian, Chinese, Japanese, Aleut, Eskimo, Hawaiian and Part-Hawaiian (combined), and “other nonwhite.”

The category “white” includes, in addition to persons reported as “white,” those reported as Mexican or Puerto Rican. With one exception, a reported mixture of Negro with any other race is included in the Negro group; other mixed parentage is classified according to the race of the nonwhite parent and mixtures of nonwhite races to the race of the father. The exception refers to a mixture of Hawaiian and any other race, which is classified as Part-Hawaiian.

In most tables a less detailed classification of “white” and “nonwhite” is used.

Now we know the government is a stickler for codes so that big brother can keep track of all our statistics. Well, according the the US CDC website there have been some revisions as of late to the types of codes for ‘race’ on vital records certificates.

Prior to 2009, the latest revision to the actual long form took place in 2004. In 1961, a black person was listed as either ‘black’ or ‘negro’. In 2004, the one showing on the CDC site shows he could have been listed as either ‘black’ or ‘African American’ as ethnicity then came into play. Now in 2009 (revised 1/09), codes for those of the Negro race are listed and one can now be listed as just ‘African’ as is shown on Obama’s COLB.

US vital statistic birth records for 1961 in Hawaii (By place Of residence. Data refer only to births occurring within the United States. Based on a 50-percent sample. “Metropolitan counties” include all counties that are standard metropolitan statistical areas (metropolitan State economic areas for New England). “Nonmetropolitan counties” include all other counties):

On page 205 are the statistics for Live Births, non-White Hawaiian births:

• 12,198 — non-white births

• 12,110 — attended in a hospital by physician
• 50 — attended out of a hospital by physician or midwife

• 38 — unattended

So, that’s around 76 unattended births in the year Obama was born. Was Barack Obama one of those 76? Information regarding these birth came from the word or statement of a relative. It might account for the Obama/Nordyke birth certificate numbers anomaly.

Note: Enter — 205 — into the Adobe Reader page number text box and hit enter.


45 posted on 04/27/2011 3:43:38 PM PDT by WellyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson