People who believe that the most likely scenario in 1962 was for an American woman to travel from Hawaii to Kenya and bear a child, and then somehow get a U.S. passport for that child and make it back to that little island with no one the wiser, will believe anything they want to.
I feel it is up to some of us that are not in the so-called "Birther" ranks to bring up the flaw in your statement.
Those that have asked for the Long Form Birth Certificate have done so for two reasons. First they believe that the Constitution's specific wording of "natural born citizen" precludes certain people that might other might otherwise be citizens not requiring naturalization and the full and actual birth records would answer how a son of a British Colonial subject meets that qualification. Secondly they have seen all sorts of false and misleading documents issued earlier. As it is obvious that large sums of money and great effort has been expended to not produce a simple document we all have been called for to produce in the course of our lifetime, the obvious question is, "what is trying to be hidden."
The Electoral College and the House actions regarding the election have obviously taken place. The various State officials certified the election results without commenting or qualifying. He was Inaugurated and sworn in by the Chief Justice. The Constitution gives only one format for removal from office so no civil or statute court action could save us from the actions of our country in making him President. Subtleties of native born citizen versus natural born citizen sound like so much Jim Crow "poll tax" issues to most of our countrymen. In the last fifty years we have entered an era where all the social standards for legitiment birth, parantage and norms of the prior era have been set aside in not only society, but law in many cases.
There are hundreds of marxists that could stand in his place or be elected next time and it is the policies that have to be defeated, not this scam artist alone. That being said, I am not going to dismiss the "Birthers" as carpers about his birth place alone -- there arguements are detailed, extensive and honest -- I just don't think they matter.
>> “...and then somehow get a U.S. passport for that child and make it back to that little island...” <<
.
Are you really that ignorant?
New born children travel under the mother’s passport; all that is required is a visit to the nearest US Consulate for a stamp, which in this case would have been less than 10 miles away.