[OldDeckHand]

"300 witnesses are wrong?"

There is nothing more unreliable than people on the ground describing what they see happening in the sky, especially when what's happening is MILES from where they're located.

"What's your interest in the cover up?"

Of course, it's a "cover up". It would be the biggest cover-up since the moon landings were faked, or something.

Anyone who thinks that the federal government, to include a variety of elements of the US military and most of the 2nd Fleet, can "cover up" anything, let alone something as big as this, really has NOT been paying attention to the incompetence of our government for the last 50-years.

[buccaneer81]

I guess you never heard of the Warren Commission.

[microgood]

Anyone who thinks that the federal government, to include a variety of elements of the US military and most of the 2nd Fleet, can "cover up" anything, let alone something as big as this, really has NOT been paying attention to the incompetence of our government for the last 50-years.

But if it was a terrorist attack, then the number of people involved shrinks rapidly, and those picking up the pieces only have a piece of the puzzle.

Anyone who believes the official explanation is incedibly naive.

[buccaneer81]

Something has me believing that you have/had skin in the game. A contingency fee perhaps?