Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: bgill
I should add, that it could be they realized that they (state Legislatures) do not have the authority to define the requirement for who may be considered a "natural born Citizen" as required for AII,S1,C5 of the U.S. Constitution.

The U.S. Congress tried to do just that back in 1790, and reversed themselves in 1795.

34 posted on 04/13/2011 2:52:34 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: rxsid

Arizona, aka The RAT Pimp McLame, did nothing but insure Hussein’s right to hold office. HI has said this digital bs is their only official BC proof (lie!) so he’s good to go without the parental requirement attached. Now, the talking points will be, “But, but, gee whiz, what do you Birthers want?!? You wanted this bill and we gave it to you and The Won is still eligibile, so there, neener, neener!!!”

No, this is NOT going to help our cause. It is a major 47 steps backward.


35 posted on 04/13/2011 3:00:55 PM PDT by bgill (Kenyan Parliament - how could a man born in Kenya who is not even a native American become the POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson