What Alternate Universe does the Sarah Palin Adoration Society live in?
FOX News Poll (February 7-9, 2011)
Question 3: I am going to read you a list of names. Tell me if you think that person would make a good President or not.
Sarah Palin:
.................YES.........NO.......DK.....Never heard of
ALL...........23%.......72%.........4%.......1%
Dem ...........7%........87%........5%.......1%
Rep ...........40%.......56%.......3%.......1%
Ind ...........25%........69%.......3%.......1%
Too often, those who cover Palin do not listen to her words or read her statements
I do. That is why I know that Sarah Palin is as totally clueless and incompetent in foreign affairs as Barack Obama is.
Take libya, for example.
About three weeks ago, Free Republic was discussing the idiocy of Barack Obama deciding to overthrow Gadhafi and support the "rebels" without ever bothering to discover that "the rebels" were, in large part, actually al Qaeda.
One FReeper posted that Obama would be pleased to help al Qaeda.
Here is my reply:
=================
Obama will be pleased.
Why do you think he acted so quickly
Because of stupidity. Because, in foreign affairs, Barack Obama is totally clueless. Because Barack Obama never bothered to do his homework and educate himself. Because Barack Obama was an Affirmative Action candidate that too many irrational people gushed over because of the way he looked and sounded instead of what he knew and you can't realistically expect anything but FUBAR's from such a President.
Barack Obama got into the "Let's overthrow Gadhafi" chess game without ever bothering to study what would happen beyond the first move of "Pawn to King 4".
Barack Obama had not thought out the chess game beyond the extremely naïve notion that you can:
1.) Topple Gadhafi so that
2.) America can then Cut & Run so that
3.) The Democracy Fairy can wave her Magic Wand and everybody lives happily ever after
The three major problems with that childishly naïve lunacy are that:
1.) There is no such thing as a Democarcy Fairy
2.) In all of military history, air power has never, ever, secured a single square mile of territory. To secure territorry, you need "boots on the ground". The 8th Air Force may have flattened East Berlin in World War II but East Berlin became Communist because, after the bombing, it was the Soviets with "boots on the ground" there.
3.) The one warring faction that is pouring fighters into Libya in order to have "boots on the ground" to secure the final Victory in Libya is al Qaeda. ("Thank you, U.S. air power, for giving us the future Billions of dollars of Libyan oil revenues that we will use to kill Americans!")
After his intial blunder, saner heads at the Pentagon pointed out to Obama:
"Mr. President, what about the fact that al Qaeda has been flooding Libya with radical Islamist fighters in order to be the only warring faction with the necessary "boots on the ground" to secure the final control over Libya? You specifically expect to "get out" and leave a power vacuum in Libya that al Qaeda is already mobilized to fill? It will turn over Libya and it's oil wealth over to the Islamic radicals just as surely as Jimmy Carter's blundering with another dictator turned Iran over to the Islamist fanatics."
Then, Obama realized what an idiot he has been.
"What should I do now? How can I fix this?"
"Stalemate, Mr. President. We will claim a stalemate. With Gadhafi still in power, we can use him as a proxy to keep the radical Islamists in check just like George H. W. Bush used Saddam to keep the Iranian-backed, radical Islamists in southern Iraq in check in 1991 after the Gulf War."
So, the Pentagon starts making statements about "Stalemate".
This is the Charlie Foxtrot that happens when voters support a ridiculously unprepared and unqualified Affirmative Action candidate just because they absolutely adore how that candidate looks and sounds without ever bothering to figure out if that candiate would lead America into FUBAR after FUBAR through sheer ignorance and incompetence.
You do not have to be a secret al Qaeda supporter to get America into such a FUBAR and hand Billions of dollars of future oil revenue over to al Qaeda.
You just have to be so utterly unqualified to be Commander-in-Chief that you actually have the extremely naïve notion that you can:
1.) Topple Gadhafi so that
2.) America can then Cut & Run so that
3.) The Democracy Fairy can wave her Magic Wand and everybody lives happily ever after
Case in point:
"So what our president said at first, that our mission is to see Qaddafi go, he's got to go, but then we're told by one of his top advisers, the president's top advisers, saying, Well, no, really, Qaddafi is probably going to prevail on this. He's probably going to prevail over the opposition. And then our president changes the tune again, saying, Well, it's not our mission to oust Qaddafi. A lot of confusion. I would like to see, of course, as long as we're in it -- we better be in it to win it. And if there's doubt, we get out. Win it means Qaddafi goes and America gets to get on out of there and let the people of Libya create their own government" .... Sarah Palin in interview with Greta van Sustern
"But, Governor Palin, what about the fact that al Qaeda has been flooding Libya with radical Islamist fighters in order to be the only warring faction with the necessary "boots on the ground" to secure the final control over Libya? You specifically expect to "get out" and leave a power vacuum in Libya that al Qaeda is already mobilized to fill? It will turn over Libya and it's oil wealth over to the Islamic radicals just as surely as Jimmy Carter's blundering with another dictator turned Iran over to the Islamist fanatics."
"Umm ... What do you mean by "boots on the ground"? What's an "Islamist"? What does al Qaeda have to do with any of this and the Democracy Fairy?"
Can you try to shorten your post? Make your point more concise.
Don’t try to hide a poor argument behind lots of words.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Aliquam suscipit convallis ultricies. Nam gravida fermentum placerat. Vestibulum posuere hendrerit vulputate. Cras ullamcorper, mauris in commodo congue, Polybius is an idiot mauris mi ullamcorper magna, vel suscipit quam nulla vitae ante. Fusce consectetur scelerisque leo, ac pellentesque ligula blandit malesuada. Pellentesque sit amet massa a enim auctor facilisis a non orci. Nulla auctor aliquam purus, ut tempus felis molestie non. Phasellus fringilla, turpis eget laoreet laoreet, tortor nunc pretium mauris, eu viverra leo dolor ac massa. Pellentesque dictum tincidunt pretium. Nulla eget enim pharetra augue dapibus tristique. Morbi nunc tortor, faucibus vitae placerat quis, aliquet eu orci. Polybius is an idiot. Maecenas congue metus in sapien faucibus sit amet semper dui aliquam. Proin id velit est. Quisque in libero lacinia ante mattis lacinia ac vitae nulla. In pellentesque leo justo, ac auctor mauris. Polybius is an idiot. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Nulla aliquet egestas risus.
Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Polybius is an idiot. Aenean sodales tellus nulla. Cras velit est, pharetra ut consectetur vel, hendrerit sit amet massa. Cras tristique adipiscing fermentum. Cras et mauris enim. Curabitur mattis tellus vel sem pretium malesuada quis vitae urna. Polybius is an idiot. Proin sed consequat odio. Donec imperdiet odio tempus sapien faucibus fermentum. Phasellus quis odio nisi, sed condimentum magna. Aenean turpis tellus, convallis at porta ultricies, congue sit amet nisi. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos. Polybius is an idiot. Suspendisse ac lacus augue, sit amet placerat justo. Donec in massa ut nisl pulvinar pellentesque. Quisque mattis diam quis lacus ullamcorper convallis. Vivamus ac pretium neque. Fusce vulputate lorem ut risus lacinia porta. Aenean tristique metus eu nibh pellentesque blandit. Donec ut orci urna, et tempor lacus. Ut fermentum congue dapibus. Polybius is an idiot.
I agree you should shorten the post. Just give the bullet points. I agree with your premise.