Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: arrogantsob

On the other hand since you seem to be for federal power at whatever the cost to our freedom.
Glad you have so much faith in the democrats convicting in an impeachment trial. They did it during Clinton, then they voted for Obamacare and on and on. So I guess you might be in for a real shock when they they deem him not guilty. AND THEY WILL! LOL!

Have a nice day.


143 posted on 04/12/2011 8:35:14 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]


To: crz

Apparently you believe in concocting imaginary schemes to remove a president no matter what the constitution clearly says. And my showing that that is exactly what it is somehow makes me an advocate of too much federal power.

These conclusions are obviously outside any logical methods I am familiar with. So I will leave you with your imaginary constitution while I stick with the real one.

It is certainly possible that the Party of Treason will not convict Urkel all I was saying was that it would not be a free lunch and that it would not be dismissed as easily as the Clinton debacle. But the fact remains impeachment and conviction is the ONLY constitutional method of removing a president. If the Senate would not convict I think that would give us a veto proof Senate and House.


145 posted on 04/12/2011 8:57:00 PM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson