Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: rolling_stone
FYI social security numbers and where they were obtained is a tool of law enforcement and used all the time.

Perhaps, but the simple fact that someone's SSN has a prefix in a state in which he never resided is not, ipso facto, a reason to suspect that it is fraudulant.

44 posted on 04/11/2011 5:36:51 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: curiosity

ooo, using fancy Latin phrases to defend your idol now, eh? ... Loosen your kneepads obamanoid, having several SSNs is evidence of fraud. Worship your Barry the Bastard on some other board for a while.


45 posted on 04/11/2011 5:39:59 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: curiosity
Perhaps, but the simple fact that someone's SSN has a prefix in a state in which he never resided is not, ipso facto, a reason to suspect that it is fraudulant

Really? So what is a reason to suspect a card is fraudulent and why are law enforcement officers trained in that tool? What is founded suspicion, probable cause, preponderance of the evidence?

46 posted on 04/11/2011 5:40:31 PM PDT by rolling_stone ( *this makes Watergate look like a kiddie pool*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: curiosity

Yo “ipso facto”, it’s been several weeks now and you still can’t spell “fraudulent”, yet you continue to peddle that ol’ “typo” fraud thingy!

JC


51 posted on 04/11/2011 7:21:04 PM PDT by cracker45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson