That would only prove the Mombasa bc and the usurper's footprint didn't match. It wouldn't prove or disprove anything else and you'd be back as square one. It may or may not prove the Mombasas bc was a true document and you wouldn't be any closer to who the usurper might be. It wouldn't prove if the usurper was Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro or not. It wouldn't prove if he was born in HI, Kenya, or Mars. Same thing with a HI long form. Nothing will prove who this freak is and he knows it. That's the game he's playing and will continue to play.
That would only prove the Mombasa bc and the usurper's footprint didn't match. It wouldn't prove or disprove anything else and you'd be back as square one. It may or may not prove the Mombasas bc was a true document and you wouldn't be any closer to who the usurper might be. It wouldn't prove if the usurper was Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro or not. It wouldn't prove if he was born in HI, Kenya, or Mars. Same thing with a HI long form. Nothing will prove who this freak is and he knows it. That's the game he's playing and will continue to play.
I agree with that. I don't think you can tell yet where he does come from or where he was born. I don't think there is any consideration that would keep him from publishing evidence he was born in the US if he had it--so I remain convinced he was born offshore.
I doubt that he matches the footprint--my point was that if he does, the argument is over. If he doesn't we are still looking.