To: little jeremiah
Currently parents toilet train kids a lot later than they did a couple of generations ago, just an observation.
It may be parents toilet train children later now vs. a couple of generations ago....but what's "a lot later"? Toilet training a child after 2, 2 and 1/2 years? Beginning the training at an earlier age, yet they remain in diapers during the training at 2, 2 and 1/2?
I don't think having a child in diapers at 2 to 2 1/2 years is anywhere out of the realm of possibilities in the 60's, 70's, 80's, 90, 2000's or anytime.
If I trust any memory of Mary, it will be the diaper phase. That's an event/phase that she is more likely to remember versus her daughter's age of when that occurred, some 45 years later. It's not very helpful as far as defining a specific time that she babysat obama, but it is what it is.
647 posted on
04/20/2011 4:38:42 PM PDT by
Girlene
To: Girlene; LucyT
I think there’s a certain amount of confusion here, it wasn’t Mary who talked about diapers, certainly not that I recall.
IT WAS SUSAN BLAKE:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=advfrQEeIBY
A short snip is all that remains of the original interview.
649 posted on
04/20/2011 5:12:14 PM PDT by
Fred Nerks
(FAIR DINKUM!)
To: Girlene
I had kids in the early 70s and did a lot of babysitting through my teen years and later. A child still in diapers at two and over was considered laziness by the parents at that time, IMO. A child in diapers at 2 1/2 would have been very unusual.
It’s certainly not a big deal, but remember in those days it was all cloth diapers, no throw aways.
650 posted on
04/20/2011 5:20:10 PM PDT by
little jeremiah
(Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson