[Fractal Trader]

nothing there at all about a wedding! SHAME ON YOU FOR SPREADING LIES!

You are most clearly wrong on this matter. This is a long article and probably took me at least 45 minutes to read. I've been reading a lot of articles in their entirety (the Post and Email seems like a great source, among others) because I am extremely interested in knowing, to the best possible degree of certainty, the true Barack, jr nativity story.

It is abundantly clear that you did not read the article. In fact, if you had searched for "marriage," you would have easily found the money quote. Instead you call me a liar???

Here's the relevant text:

I looked at the 1960-65 marriage index by groom and confirmed that Obama Sr. was listed there as a groom and Stanley Ann as the bride to confirm that there was a record that he was married to Stanley Ann.

[Brown Deer]

It is abundantly clear that you did not read the article.

Indeed, I have read the article, so you lied again!

In fact, if you had searched for "marriage," you would have easily found the money quote. Instead you call me a liar???

I sure did because you never said anything at all about "marriage"! You mentioned a wedding!

researcher finds listings for the wedding of Barack, Sr and Stanley Ann.

There is nothing at all in that interview about a wedding. The researcher mentions that a misspelled name of 0bama, Sr. was listed next to the name of Stanley Ann Dunham on a printout with a date range of five years and no other information!

The article also mentions finding Barack Hussein Obama II in the indexes, yet you then go on to say,

The married, had a child (in Mombasa) and that child stayed with Stanley Ann through her period in Seattle and Hawaii, and possibly through a trip to Boston.

You are a hypocrite! SHAME ON YOU!