thanks, really, one should laugh, if it wasn’t so sad. If that was Stanley Ann Dunham for whom Mary baby-sat in January 1961, Stanley Ann Dunham would still have been in High School when that child was conceived.
And who was it identified Anna Obama as Stanley Ann Dunham?
THE WOMAN WHO OPERATES SEATTLE MUSEUM OF THE MYSTERIES.
Now ain’t that a giggle? She also does GHOST TOURS and holds seances.
In all fairness to Joseph, I doubt if he had any idea of what was going on, he and Mary divorced in the seventies iirc. Here’s something Joseph wrote in 2006:
Regardless of what misguided liberals and the Democrat Party thinks ours is a Christian Nation. From its founders to the present. I am an immigrant from a Moslem country and the main reason I am in this country since 1946 is that in the moderate Moslim country I’m from there was no future unless you were Moslem. I don’t think there is any good reason to change what we have done for hundreds of years in our country to accomodate a handful of immigrants Who demand we change our culture for their convenience. If they don’t believe in the Bible that is fine neither does an atheist a Hindu or a criminal and so on…. We should still demand that they take the oath on the Bible as that is meaningful to us. If they violate that oath they should suffer the consequences.
Comment by joseph toutonghi — December 21, 2006 @ 10:36 pm
Pushing baby Barack's birth back to January 1961 might be consistent with Mary Toutonghi's account, but it's inconsistent with Stanley Ann Dunham's college transcripts, which have her enrolling in the U. Of Washington in August 1961. The only way to explain the discrepency would be to accept that Stanley Ann was not Baby Barack's mother. But then why would 17 year-old Stanley Ann be taking responsibility for another woman's baby while attending college at the U. of Washington? Highly unlikely, IMHO.