[Seizethecarp]

“Obviously, a date of birth for Michelle Hunt (who is probably married by now) might give a clue as to how old Anna's child might have been...It was after June, and could have been as late as September, 1962.”

Obviously the Anna in question is Stanley Ann Dunham Obama and the child is Barry, as this Anna was Hunt's classmate at Mercer. Unless some huge conspiracy placed all of these classmate accounts in the record in SEATTLE which KILLS the DREAMS narrative...which I would have thought any Obama Team conspiracy would have conspired to support!

[Fred Nerks]

...Obviously the Anna in question is Stanley Ann Dunham Obama and the child is Barry, as this Anna was Hunt's classmate at Mercer.

Was there an ANNA at Mercer? And she moved to Seattle with a child named Barry?

[Greenperson]

Obama, himself, “kills the Dreams narrative,” when he places an introduction/forward in the second edition of the book that ADMITS that the entire story is nothing more than a fable. FICTIONALIZED “history”. He says they are composite characters. He says the timeline is wrong. He says the conversations are invented (or recreated). How much more does it take than an admission from the alleged author to kill the entire narrative? Somebody (the publisher? his lawyer? himself?) likely knew that the book was fiction, thus the disclaimer, which most media sources fail to mention.