Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: David
...The U of W transcript is a very important document. Because if it is real, it attests to her 1960 Mercer Island graduation; it attests to the U of Hawaii portion of the fairy tale.

Just like the Certification of Live Birth shown on fightthesmears website is 'real'?

...As a matter of fact, the desire of the author's to eliminate that information must be the only excuse for why it is not there...

It's NOT THERE because ANNA OBAMA wasn't meant to be discovered. Charlette Le Fevre upset the apple-cart...and the rest of the U of WA story follows from there.

1,093 posted on 04/24/2011 2:35:42 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1091 | View Replies ]


To: Fred Nerks; LucyT
"...The U of W transcript is a very important document. Because if it is real, it attests to her 1960 Mercer Island graduation; it attests to the U of Hawaii portion of the fairy tale."

Just like the Certification of Live Birth shown on fightthesmears website is 'real'?

There is obviously a distinction. In the case of the transcript, you have the official issuer confirming the document as real. You could presumably get an investigator to go look at the public record and find it. They have a counterpart where they have converted the historical document to a computer entry which they have printed out for you (with the same entry data) and issued as a current official document.

Nothing on the COLB can be confirmed as real by anyone and it is almost certainly a photoshop manufactured document.

I will concede you could duplicate the U of W documents with photoshop but the U of W would tell you they weren't real.

Matter of fact, the circumstances and manner in which the U addressed the error about the August versus September issue ought to give you some comfort about the effort to preserve the actual record. Assuming the letter posted above is real, they are addressing circumstances in which they had given Corsi a letter attesting to the accuracy of the initial printout of the computer record reflecting conversion of the historical original entry transcript which computer conversion record is clearly in error. So they write this letter admitting error; describing why it happened; and describing the real facts; as we knew they existed. (By they way, I never talked to them. I have no idea what the impetus was to write the current letter--I have assumed you knew or made it happen although I have never thought to ask.)

Now their books of original entry might in fact have already been tampered with but what they are now saying is consistent only with the existence of one of the original old form transcripts in a binder. I remain on the position that it is difficult to see how that could have been created fraudulently but I am not going to say it is not possible.

1,101 posted on 04/24/2011 3:35:18 PM PDT by David (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1093 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson