Of Obobs were coaching Toutonghi, they would have silenced her because she places SADO in WA at the address on SADO’s transcript which KILLS the Dreams narrative.
There is no corroboration for her nearly 50 year old memory that her own baby was 18 months old when she babysat SADO.
I am not the one relying on this statement made by a woman who repeatedly says she is having trouble remembering the exact dates in these 50 year old interviews.
What she claims to remember corroborates the U of WA transcripts. Her memory would never stand up in court without corroboration. There is corroboration for the U. of WA transcripts in the U. of HI transcripts.
The indirect calculation of a January 1961 babysitting date or the existence of an alternate Anna Obama who is not SADO is corroborated by nothing.
BTW, Trump is going with the SADO in WA in Sept 1961 narrative because, apparently, he found it to be credible.
A. I don’t care what Trump is going with. If he’s hitting Zer0 on any aspect of his non-eligibility it’s all good.
B. I don’t understand why you are so into this.
C. At this point - as I mentioned above - any and all leads should be followed until they meet a dead end. No pre-conceptions or fondly held beliefs are useful, and are in fact the very thing that places obstacles in the path of finding the truth about the guy in the White House.