Posted on 04/11/2011 8:55:58 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
agree -— and all of the FR replies about scrubbing came the next day after your original post.
If your original graphic had been scrubbed, how does it now get replaced with a weird substitute graphic (as well as the Bluegrass Pundit site). If your original graphic had been substituted with the weird graphic the following day of your original post, one would think Freepers would have commented on the weird graphic, rather than say it had been scrubbed.
“So...bluegrasspundit must have copied text and images from the FR comment”
And the image would have come from third source (which would also have weird graphic now, I would presume.)-— the two posts were within hours of one another.
AND THEN LATER ON THE SAME DAY...THIS FROM SUNKENCIV WHO WROTE:
alas,
http://oi54.tinypic.com/651zdw.jpg
The image or video has been moved or deleted what a shocker.
Thanks Fred Nerks and et al for the FReepmail.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2702976/posts?page=1629#1629
1,857 posted on 04/28/2011 5:24:17 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
INCLUDES THE URL FOR THE SUBSTITUTE IMAGE. SO THERE WAS A NOTICE THERE ON THAT #1612 TO SAY THE ORIGINAL HAD BEEN REMOVED, YET THE URL FOR THE SUBSTITUTE APPEARED?
I doubt SunkenCiv would remember now...
What photo was it? Can you post it again?
Post it again. Let several people upload it to photobucket, see if they are all removed as well.
1,612 posted on Thursday, 28 April 2011 10:48:14 AM by Fred Nerks
WHICH response (can you give a link) is showing that date? I show you posted 1612 on 1,612 posted on Wednesday, April 27, 2011 8:48:14 PM by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
To: Brown Deer
Part of the “date signed by the mother” matches perfectly with the “date signed” on one of the Nordyke twins birth certificate
IMAGE SUBSTITUTE
1,612 posted on Thursday, 28 April 2011 10:48:14 AM by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
just on a weird hunch, what time/date is it in OZ right now
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2702976/posts?page=1612#1612
To: Brown Deer
Part of the “date signed by the mother” matches perfectly with the “date signed” on one of the Nordyke twins birth certificate
1,612 posted on Thursday, 28 April 2011 10:48:14 AM by Fred Nerks
Your date makes more sense...Wednesday, April 27, 2011 8:48:14 PM by Fred Nerks
Just a guess, but the date that is there now might reflect when the subsitute was posted?
HOW could I have been told the original image had been removed BEFORE I posted #1612.
OF COURSE!
the time is now 9.34am Tuesday, November 22...but I always thought the time shown on a comment reflected when it was RECEIVED at FR...
“the time is now 9.34am Tuesday, November 22...but I always thought the time shown on a comment reflected when it was RECEIVED at FR...”
2,069 posted on Tuesday, 22 November 2011 9:44:14 AM by Fred Nerks
and what time was it when you received the message?
(btw, that clock must be out, it didn’t take me 10 minutes to send the message.)
It doesn’t make sense to me why it is showing that post to you with that date, but the shift in time works. Too odd!
OF COURSE!
the time is now 9.34am Tuesday, November 22...but I always thought the time shown on a comment reflected when it was RECEIVED at FR...
2,069 posted on Monday, November 21, 2011 5:44:14 PM by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
Also, we just ended daylight savings time a couple weeks ago (and set clock one hour back). I’m working off of EST time.
and I am also on daylight savings time...one hour in advance.
Does that explain anything...you read my comment 1612 the day before my record shows I posted it?
will you please copy that comment from your end, showing that date?
To: Brown Deer
Part of the "date signed by the mother" matches perfectly with the "date signed" on one of the Nordyke twins birth certificate
GRAPHIC (now substituted with the odd graphic)
1,612 posted on Wednesday, April 27, 2011 8:48:14 PM by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1603 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
1,612 posted on Wednesday, April 27, 2011 8:48:14 PM by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
OK...GOT THAT NOW.
Please now copy the same information from the bottom of the comment made by arrowhead a couple of comments down from #1612
and post BOTH times/dates into a comment box
...and if that TIME and date are STILL ahead of when I posted, it would seem arrowhead warned me BEFOREHAND. Which is impossible.
You know if you scroll back through this thread there are lots of pics removed by photobucket but none replaced by another. This is weird.
Arrowhead’s post (post # 1811) with date stamp, followed by your 1612 post with date stamp, AND SunkenCiv’s post #1857 with date stamp (with link to the SUBSTITUTED TRASH GRAPHIC)
~~~~~~~~~~~
To: Fred Nerks
Whatever you linked to there [1612] has ben scrubbed.
1,811 posted on Thursday, April 28, 2011 12:47:44 PM by Arrowhead1952 (The American taxpayer cannot support the tax and spend habits of DC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1612 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You posted #1612 on:
1,612 posted on Wednesday, April 27, 2011 8:48:14 PM by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1603 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
~~~~~~~~~~
alas,
http://oi54.tinypic.com/651zdw.jpg
The image or video has been moved or deleted what a shocker.
Thanks Fred Nerks and et al for the FReepmail.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2702976/posts?page=1629#1629
1,857 posted on Thursday, April 28, 2011 8:24:17 PM by SunkenCiv (Thanks Cincinna for this link — http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1612 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
1,611 posted on Thursday, 28 April 2011 10:35:35 AM
Fred Nerks
1,612 posted on Wednesday, April 27, 2011 8:48:14 PM Fred Nerks
1,811 posted on Thursday, April 28, 2011 12:47:44 PM Arrowhead1952
1,857 posted on Thursday, April 28, 2011 8:24:17 PM
SunkenCiv
AND WHAT TIME AND DATE DOES IT SHOW YOUR END FOR #1611
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.