Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: rockrr

Correct, sort of. He told SC’s governor that Sumter would be abandoned and he wouldn’t send any more munitions and men, and then broke his promise by trying to send battleships then arms and troops (his own general’s were outraged). By forcing SC’s hand, he could let his minions in congress say that SC had levied war on the U.S. and now he was justified to use “war powers” without a war!

The fact that it went on throughout reconstruction and has allowed the Executive to grow in power ever since (vs the other 2 arms of gov’t and the states) is exactly the point.


77 posted on 04/11/2011 12:09:58 PM PDT by phi11yguy19
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: phi11yguy19
I had read that buchanan had some sort of unspecified "agreement" with SC Governor Pickett, but I've never heard any specifics, and certainly never heard of any agreement with the Lincoln administration.

The fact that it went on throughout reconstruction and has allowed the Executive to grow in power ever since (vs the other 2 arms of gov’t and the states) is exactly the point.

Not sure what point you're trying to make here since no one can point with authority to the Lincoln administration as being the specific identifiable position at which a disparity in the particular powers was definitively and irretrievably upset.

86 posted on 04/11/2011 1:52:21 PM PDT by rockrr ("Remember PATCO!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson