Replies

As I said it your view which is extreme and is not moral even. You belief in a ntaural right to tear down the rule of law. You believe in rebellion and anarchy, imo.

You claim that I am not an expert. Fine. But I claim that no expert would ever be good enough for you because you think that you can make up rights and law as you go along. You belief that treason is a right when it is not.

But I claim that no expert would ever be good enough for you because you think that you can make up rights and law as you go along.

All rights come from God. As for the USC it isn't followed anymore, Lincoln be-shat it and nobody has bothered to clean his stain. A constitution not followed is worse than no constitution at all. For this situation breeds contempt in the patriot and gives credence, a fig leaf to cover the naked ambition of the statist.

Please read this observation from the British...then stop you repeated ignorant use of the word "treason" (or answer the questions below which the North never did):

"Assuredly there is no disposition in this country to lean in favour of turmoil; but we cannot realize an act as that of rebellion or treason or piracy, simply because these names are applied to it. We are told that in the United States the people are sovereign. Here is an act committed by many millions of this sovereign people; against whom do they rebel? Can a sovereign, or a large portion of a sovereignty, be a rebel? In the usual meaning of our language rebellion is an act of the subject. Are, then, many millions of the sovereign people of the United States subjects, and to whom? Who is the monarch so supreme that in comparison even the sovereignty of the people may be termed a rebel? Is it the law? But where is the law? Assertions are not laws, nor yet ambitious theories, nor yet conceptions of advantage. Laws are enactments solemn, comprehensive, on known and legible record. Where, then, is the law which the States of the South have broken? And if in America the Government be merely an agent, then, as there exists no law that forbids the secession of a State, against whom or what do they rebel?"